Showing posts with label sikh news. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sikh news. Show all posts

Monday, 13 July 2015

RACE ISSUE; Sikh postman accuses Disney World of discrimination by segregating routes

Gurdit Singh, with help of American Civil Liberties Union, won right to drive regular routes after alleging Florida theme park restricted his work
Gurdit Singh, a Disney World postman, claims the theme park discriminate against him based on his religious faith. Photograph: ACLU

When people hear that Gurdit Singh is a postman at Disney World, Florida, visions might come to mind of a man waving to Mickey Mouse and Snow White on his daily delivery route.
But at a theme park where dreams supposedly come true, the postman has claimed segregation from Disney customers and its staff because of his turban and beard.
Now Singh, a Sikh, has won the right to drive regular routes – even in this most irregular of postal delivery codes, free of discrimination.
Singh has worked as a private postman at Disney World in Florida since 2008, but he says he only drove an out-of-sight route while other park delivery workers switched routes every few weeks. He attempted to get Disney to switch him to the regular rotation with no success before contacting the American Civil Liberties Union and the Sikh Coalition.
“Where companies have these look policies or other uniform standards, it’s especially difficult for individuals of minority faiths to meet the requirements and so it disproportionately affects them,” Heather Weaver, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU, told the Guardian.
In May, the ACLU and the Sikh Coalition wrote a letter to Disney demanding that Singh be granted religious accommodation, so that he could drive in the regular rotation and follow his faith.
“My turban and beard serve as a constant reminder of my commitment to my faith ... these articles remind everybody that we’re all equal,” Singh told the BBC. “That’s not just a Sikh value, that’s an American value.”
Weaver told the Guardian that Disney responded to their letter quickly.
“They immediately recognized that their previous denials of religious accommodation had been wrong and started to take steps to make sure he worked all the mail routes,” she said.

“I think this is a great first step to ensuring that Disney’s workforce is religiously diverse and that customers see that in their interactions with Disney’s employees.”
In the letter, Disney not only granted Singh’s request but defended its position as a non-discriminatory company.
“Walt Disney Parks and Resorts US Inc is an employer of choice that is committed to diversity and prohibits discrimination based upon religion,” they wrote.
But Gurjot Kaur, a lawyer for the Sikh Coalition, told the BBC that Singh had faced issues with Disney before. He first applied for a job in 2005, the attorney said, and was told he would have to work in the back because of his turban and beard. He said Singh later applied to be a doorman with the company in 2008 and was rejected “because his ‘costume’ did not match the ‘costume’ necessary”. Singh believed the company was referring to his turban and beard.
Disney did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Saturday, 11 July 2015

DON’T KILL YOUR DAUGHTERS, GIVE THEM TO ME AND I WILL RAISE THEM : BIBI PRAKASH KAUR:

Long before the show “Satyameva Jayate” The Bhai Ghanayya Ji Charitable Trust was established on May 17th 1993 running as ‘Unique Home’ which looks after unwanted, unclaimed or orphan children whom society shuns.
The baby girls are found by road sides, dumped by running water, or even left during the night in the baby cradle outside the home. Unique Home with an aim “Moral, Social, Cultural and Economic uplift of orphan children without any distinction of Caste, Creed and Religion”.
To raise these children as enlightened and self respecting citizens and restore them their due place in society is a very hard task that required a mass, social effort. We appeal to all kind hearted people to come forward with all possible means.
The main spirit behind this institution is Bibi Prakaash Kaur, whose aim is to rehabilitate those people whom society has disowned. The current seva is being done by Bibi Gurdip Kaur, who is the President of Bhai Ghanayya Ji Charitable Trust. Despite her old age, she is fully devoted to the service of the children.
In a state infamous for female foeticide, Prakash Kaur is mother to 60 abandoned girls. She’s given them a life to look forward to; when their own parents wished them death. Every girl here at the Unique Home in Jalandhar is getting a shot at good education and a secure future; all thanks to the woman they proudly call their mother.
The woman behind the home is Prakash Kaur, who was herself left on the streets as a baby 60 years ago. Since 1993, she has dedicated her life to the noble but onerous mission of rescuing unwanted and unclaimed newborn girls and giving them a secure home and future.
Today, Unique Home for Girls has 60-odd residents who call Prakash Kaur mother. “They are my own children,” the lady says. “They are never made to feel like abandoned children.”
As we walk around the home, it is easy to see that her claim is quite well-founded. Even as her ‘family’ expands and her responsibilities grow, Prakash Kaur’s fount of maternal compassion shows no signs of drying up.
She has touched the lives of many who’ve been cruelly shunned by their own. Siya was only a few hours old when she was found in a drain, wrapped in a black polythene bag. Reva was a newborn when her parents decided to dump her near the highway off Kapurthala. Razia and Rabiya were just a few days old when they were discovered in the fields outside Jalandhar.

These girls have all found shelter in Unique Home, where they now enjoy the real family experience that their pitiless parents chose to deprive them of simply because of their gender. The girls who live here range from the age of four days to 19 years.
Unique Home is run by a trust named after Bhai Ghanayya Ji, a disciple of Guru Gobind Singh. The trust aims to raise these children as healthy individuals and arm them with all the social skills and educational qualifications that they need to face life on their own terms. The girls could not have found a better person than Prakash Kaur for the job of providing them with support and succour.
Most of Unique Home’s inmates arrive here as hapless, barely alive foundlings. So they have no recollections of how they are brought here. But those that have grown up in the life-affirming warmth of this home are proud that they belong here.
Under Prakash Kaur’s care and tutelage, these girls are all well adjusted individuals willing and able to take their rightful place in a society that still seems to harbour a strong aversion to children of their gender.
Prakash Kaur is acutely aware of the challenges that lie before her, but she has faith. “Yeh uparwaale ka kaam hai. Jab ussney yeh zimmedaari di hai to himmat bhi wohi dega. Jab aaj tak mujhe koi mushkil nahin aayee to aagey bhi nahin aayegi. Neki key kaam mein kabhi koi rukawat nahin aati,” she says. She is obviously getting on in years but she still retains the strength to make chapatis for all the inmates of the home three times a day and seven days a week.
The first thing that strikes one in Unique Home is a small hatched box near the entrance. It is called the “cradle”. Flip open the hatch and you see a shelf built into the wall. When a rescued child is placed on the shelf, it sets off an alarm that tells the staff that they have a new girl to take care of. When it comes to christening the new arrivals, names are drawn from all the religions of India. So at Unique Home, girls have Hindu, Muslim and Christian and Sikh names and faith has no restrictions.
Although we visited Unique Home without any prior notice, Prakash Kaur ensured that we were made to feel at home. Not surprising at all coming from a lady who has dedicated her life to dispelling a bit of the darkness that engulfs Punjab, indeed all of India. The girls brought to Unique Home grow up with a sense of belonging. This is the only home they know.
For a home that houses 60-odd girls, the place looks a bit too small. The rather cramped space has limited amenities for the girls, including three small rooms that serve as bedroom, dining area and playroom, in addition to a small kitchen and an office for visitors.The room that is meant for infants has three big cradles. Each has four to five babies sleeping in them. Unique Home has now acquired a new site and expansion plans are in place.
But living space is the least of the home’s problems for the hearts here are big. This is like a huge family where the older girls take care of the younger ones. We are told by the founder that the girls go to good English medium schools like Saint Mary’s in Mussoorie. A few have since been married into suitable homes. But Prakash Kaur’s responsibility does not end there.
She continues to keep a watch over the girls even after they are married. She fights for their rights if the in-laws prove to be difficult. Take the case of former Unique Home inmate Alka. When her husband died prematurely, her in-laws grabbed all her property and threw her out of the house. Prakash Kaur intervened and fought tooth and nail. She eventually managed to secure for Alka her rightful share in the family property.
So far Prakash Kaur has organised the marriages of 17 of the Unique Home inmates. While a few of these girls graduated from college before they got married, the remaining tied the knot after passing out of high school. However, several of the older girls here have decided not to marry and instead dedicate themselves, like Prakash Kaur, to the service of Unique Home.
April 24 is a very special day at Unique Home. It is the day when the children here collectively celebrate their birthday. A huge 100-kg cake is cut and the day is marked by much merriment. That apart, once every year, during the summer holidays, the inmates of Unique Home go on a trip to Darjeeling.
On our visit to the home, we ate lunch with the children. The food was simple but delicious: rice, chapatis and aloo gobhi. Prakash Kaur made fresh chapatis for all the 60 children.
“We don’t want to give our kids up for adoption. People come to us but we refuse,” says Prakash Kaur. Although she did not give us any specific details, she told us that she knows of many cases in which adopted girls have been ill treated.
Prakash Kaur herself has no idea who her parents were. She was found abandoned and grew up in a Nari Niketan. She describes the work she does today as “the lord’s work”.
Asked if she ever faced any mistreatment in the Nari Niketan where she grew up, she smiles and says: “I will never allow my daughters to work as maids anywhere.”
The most essential part of this home is that the children are aware of the fact that their real parents have abandoned them because they are obsessed with boys. But this poisonous truth has only strengthened their resolve to prove themselves. Sheeba, who studies in a convent school in Mussoorie, wants to be a successful neurosurgeon.
“I want my real mother to know that the daughter she threw out of her life is well established. I want to be very famous. I want to prove to her that girls are not a burden,” she says. Sheeba has always stood first in her class with A-plus grades. She is determined to make it to a good medical college.
Lucy is 19 years old. She wants to be a professor of English. “I believe that education is the only way forward in this society which discriminates against girl children,” she says.
Punjab has one of India’s most skewed sex ratios. The percentage of women in the state’s population keeps dipping every year. A growing shortage of marriageable girls has forced men here to find partners in different cultures and states.
“When French President Nicolas Sarkozy and his wife Carla Bruni came to India, they prayed for a boy. I was shocked. I used to think that Westerners treat both genders equally. He could have asked for a girl. It would have sent out a message to the people of India. It’s rather sad,” says Prakash Kaur. The French first couple prayed for a son at the Fatehpur Sikri dargah of Sufi saint Salim Chishti.
Female foeticide is on the rise, especially among the educated class and in higher strata of society. It has assumed alarming proportions. According to NGOs working with issues related to women, every year, 10 lakh cases of female foeticide take place in the country with the help of gender determination tests. The death of young girls in India exceed those of young boys by over 300,000 each year and every 6th infant death is specifically due to gender discrimination.
According to Anjalee Shenoy of Sama Resource Centre for Women and Health, new techniques like PGD (pre-implant genetic diagnosis), a method that involves producing embryos through IVF, cannot just help you decide the gender of the child but the colour of skin and hair. And there is no effective law in place right now to stop this practice. “This falls under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, but it is going undetected,” says Shenoy.
But there is hope yet. If only Prakash Kaur’s selfless spirit would rub off on society at large.

Tuesday, 7 July 2015

A sikh Truck Driver attacked by MOB

A Sikh truck driver was stopped by a mob after a vehicle collided with his truck. The truck driver repeatedly says he didn’t slam into the vehicle but instead the vehicle slammed into his truck.
The mob approached the Sikh and tried pull him out of the truck. 3 individuals can be seen assaulting the Sikh man. A dramatic turn of events occur after the Sikh defends himself by pulling out a Kirpan.
The mob disperses quickly and the truck driver went on his way. The incident teaches a lesson to be alert and active in defending oneself as the mob could have dragged the Sikh driver out and beaten him but the quick thinking of the truck driver caused him to save his life.

Tuesday, 23 June 2015

'Sikh For Justice' Facebook Page blocked in India


NEW YORK: A Sikh rights group here has alleged its Facebook page in India has been blocked in retaliation for its call to hold a referendum for "independence" of Punjab.


Sikhs for Justice (SFJ) said its Facebook page had more than 85,000 followers and cannot be accessed by the internet users in India.
SFJ claims that it called for boycott of Air India to highlight the dictatorial action of Modi Government to block the democratic campaign of SFJ to hold referendum in the state of Punjab.
To adversely affect the usage of Air India by the Sikh community, on May 12, SFJ launched an online campaign “Say NO Air India, YES to Punjab Independence Referendum”. The campaign urges the community to denounce blocking of SFJ’s Facebook Page; declare that Sikhs have a right to hold Punjab Independence Referendum and pledge not to travel by Air India.
The Sikh rights group plans to reach out to every Sikh household in North America through social media and local Gurdwaras. SFJ volunteers will be setting up “No To Air India” camps at Gurdwaras urging the community to sign the pledge boycotting India’s national airline during the upcoming busy travel season.
Advocating to banish Air India, attorney Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, legal advisor to SFJ stated that “every dictatorial action of Modi Government will be challenged through equally strong but legal, peaceful and democratic action”. “Our campaign is aimed at mounting pressure on India into holding Punjab Independence Referendum under UN Charter”, added attorney Pannun.
SFJ has given a call to hold a referendum in the year 2020 on the question of Sikh sovereignty. Referendum 2020 will be held in the state of Punjab and among Sikh diaspora living in America, Canada, United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia and Middle Eastern Countries.

source: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2015-05-07/news/61902850_1_facebook-page-sfj-sikh-rights-group
https://www.sikh24.com/2015/05/14/sikhs-for-justice-calls-for-boycott-of-air-india/#.VYmkLBuqqko

REALITY OF KOHINOOR :: KOHINOOR the property of sikhs

Kohi-Noor of Sikhs


In response to a report on BBC NEWS dated 29th July 2010, David Cameron(British PM on visit to India) has rejected calls for the famous Koh-i-Noor diamond, which has been part of the Crown Jewels for 150 years, to be returned to India.
I better warn the British Government that in case this precious diamond is ever returned , then it has to be returned to Darbar Sahib or Golden temple, Amritsar (Punjab), not to government of India because it was never a state property

Though it was confiscated by Lord Dalhusie as he claims but actually Lord Dalhousie duped the child king which is discussed here and some honest British person like John Sullivan questioned the British Empire in July 1850.

Kohi-Noor is the property of Sikhs only, not of government of India.

But historian Dr Anna Keay told the BBC that since its creation, the diamond had had many different owners, being in Persian and Afghan as well as Indian hands.

"The crucial thing is this diamond has been in circulation certainly since the beginning of the 16th Century during which time it has been in the hands of whole sequence of different rulers," told Radio 4's Today programme.

"The question is to which point do you take it back."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10802469

So the detailed information is being given to her that, how Maharaja Ranjit Singh was presented this precious diamond, The Shah in a ceremonial manner, handed over the most precious diamond in the world, to the Maharaja. 
Maharaja Ranjit Singh ji
Acquisition of Kohi-Noor by Ranjit Singh and Dalhosie;

As the precious diamond Kohinoor is now the property of Queen of England but whether she is the real owner of that precious jewel? No – She is not. It was dubiously taken from the child king Duleep Singh by a conspiracy of the conman Lord Dalhousie.

So I am giving the proves of malicious moves of Lord Dalhousie to dupe the child king and to take away the diamond and give it in the name of surrender whereas in the treaty with Lahore Darbar, this precious jewel was declared/ accepted as the property of Maharaja and his family. The British had no right to confiscate it by conspiracy and to adorn in the crown. Neither it was taken as a booty nor it was taken honorably but by jeopardize in faith of their friend, after his death.

Several accounts have been given regarding the manner of it’s possession with Maharaja Ranjit Singh. The nearest truth is narrated by Sayyad Faqir Waheed-ud-deen in his “Real Ranjit Singh. New Delhi, pp-87-90”’ as the same is based on his familyrecords , an extremely authentic source. He writes, “In 1812, Shah Shuja, a former king of Kabul, was prisoner of Ata Mohd., the Governor of Kashmir. Wazir Fateh Khan of Kabul was planning of invasion of Kashmir. Wafa Begum wife of Shah Shuja, who was then residing at Lahore, under protection of Maharaja Ranjit singh, feared that Shuja, might be murdered, in case Fatheh Khan was able to conquer Kashmir.

She promised KOHI-NOOR to Ranjit Singh as a reward, if Shuja could be united to family, at Lahore. On the other hand, Fateh Khan promised Rupees Nine Lacs in cash and half the loot, if Ranjit Singh helped him conquer Kashmir.

Both the offers were good and did not clash with each other. These were therefore accepted.

The Sikh general Dewan Mohkam Chand, ensured safety of Shah Shuja by employing utmost tact and ability and brought him back to Lahore thus fulfilling the Darbar’s part of the deal. But Shah Shuja and Wafa Begum began dallying dallying. Ranjit Singh then sent an offer of Rs. 3 Lacs and an annual Jagir of 50,000/- Rs., for the family. This was accepted by the Shah, but prayed for fifty day’s time which was granted.

On its expiry the Shah decided to handover the Kohi-Noor, if Maharaja comes in person to receive it.

This was agreed to.

The Shah in a ceremonial manner, handed over the most precious diamond in the world, to the Maharaja. The episode closed with an exchange of presents and robes of honor.

The Maharaja himself escorted the Shah to his harem.

Lord Dalhousie was no less anxious for the acquisition of the KOHI-NOOR than the conquest of the kingdom of Punjab. He wrote to Sir Henry Lawrence, then Resident at Lahore, “ to make every disposition for the safe custody of the State Jewels which were about to fall in the lap of English….It had, in fact, been found more than once on the enrollment of some new province in our Empire, which, whether by cession, by lapse or forcible annexation was growing, or about to grow, so rapidly, that the State Jewels or money had a knack of disappearing. Great care was therefore, needful, as among the Punjab jewels was the matchless Kohi-Noor, which it was intended should be expressly surrendered by Maharaja to the English Queen.
Maharaja Duleep Singh-the duped king.

CONFISCATION OF LAHORE TOSHAKHANA ;

The first important act of Lord Dalhousie, after annexation was the confiscation of property in the Lahore Toshakhana. In addition to jewels and treasurers in gold, silver and precious stones, dishes, plates, cups, cooking pots, many valuable curiosities and relics of all kinds and vast store of Kashmir shawls, choghas, etc., and the swords of Persian hero Rustam and Wazir Fateh Khan Barkzai of Kabul and the wedding garments of Sardar Maha Singh, father of Maharaja Ranjit Singh, there were ;

(a)- The Kalgi or Plume of Guru Gobind Singh,

(b)- The Kohi-Noor diamond, 

(c)- Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s golden chair, silver summer- house, gold and silver poled tents and equipage of rich Cashmere and his magnificent arms and armor.

(d)- Shah Shuja’s pavilion, gorgeously embroidered.
(Sir John and Maharaja Duleep Singh, pp. 182-83).

On November 28, 1849, Lord Dalhousie inspected the Tosha-khannah articles and decided not only on the sale of the most of the property but also on the removal of certain valuables to England for presentation to the Queen and for preservation in official museum there.

The child Maharaja was allowed to take with him only a very small part of his things to Fatehgarh in the United Province (UP), where he was removed in February 1850, when he was away from his State of Punjab.

The treaty of 1849 (Annexation) declared that all property of the State of Lahore shall be confiscated. Article 3 of the same Treaty treats the Kohi-Noor as the private property of the Maharaja, for by it, the Maharaja is made to surrender the Kohi-Noor to the Queen of England-showing that it was not amongst the property confiscated in Article-2; and the same character holds good as to the other jewels derived from Shah Shuja, for an emerald with Ahmad Shah’s name engraved upon it, and a saddle pommel made of a single emerald, both from this source, were included among the articles which the Maharaja was allowed to retain at the annexation as his private property.

Thus it was unjustifiable to characterize the property contained in the catalogues as having been confiscated by the treaty of Lahore.

Dr. login, who was appointed Maharaja’s tutor and superintendent, describes the handing over of the Kohi-Noor to Dalhousie, in a letter to his wife, then in England, Lord Dalhousie came to my quarters before he left Lahore, bringing with him a small bag, made by Lady Dalhousie to hold the jewel; and after I had formally made it over to him, he went into my room and fastened it round his waist, under his clothes, in my presence. Lord Dalhousie himself wrote out the formal receipt for the jewel, and there my responsibility ended, and I felt it a great load taken off me. All the members of the Board of Administration were present, and countersigned the document. The other jewels were also sealed up and made over.(Lady Login, Lady Login's recollections, Language department Punjab, 1970, p.81)

Thus, we have seen how the eleven year old Maharaja Duleep Singh was innocently duped and deprived, not only of his kingdom but also of such national and personal unique marvels as the Kalgi of Guru Gobind Singh, the matchless jewel Kohi-Noor and even the wedding garments of his grand father, the great Sardar Mahan Singh.

How the British says that the Sikhs have no right on Kohi-Noor? 

It was taken in a forceful manner by duping the treaty and jeopardized the faith of a friend who was no more-the Maharaja Ranjit Singh. After the death of their friend Maharaja Ranjit Singh, it was the duty of British Empire to take care of the child King and his property but he was forced to deprive of, not only of his Empire but of his valuables assets also.

The British even took away his cooking pots and utensils, either sold them or taken away to the kitchen of Queen as she had not enough.

It is very clear here mentioned within the Treaty that the, The treaty of 1849 (Annexation) declared that all property of the State of Lahore shall be confiscated. Article 3 of the same Treaty treats the Kohi-Noor as the private property of the Maharaja.

When a clause as Article 3, was already included to the effect that the British could not confiscate the personal property of the late King, how could Dalhousie take it from the child king? Is it justifiable?

The Kohi-Noor, though was offered by Wafa Begum, the wife of Shah Shuja herself to Maharaja Ranjit Singh, ‘If’ (conditionally) brings back her husband Shah Shuja safely, who was in prison of Ata Mohd., the Governor of Kashmir.Dewan Mohkam Chand ensured safety of Shah Shuja, who brought him back to Lahore. Even then after his release Maharaja pays him Three lacs of Rupees and a Jagir of 50,000/- Rs., even then the Shah Shuja was not forced to handover the Kohi-Noor to Maharaja but granted a time period of 50 days. After expiry of the period, Shah Shuja, handed over the most precious jewel of the world in a ceremonial manner and with the exchange of presents and robes of honor.
To prove the claim of Sikhs on Kohi-Noor........
An article was published in Times news paper in london before the ceremony of the contempl;ate it the Kohi-Noor to Her Majesty, in which the honest British people honestly condemned Britishh empire as;

some exracts from a lengthy communication dated July 1850, to Sir john Hobhouse, then Head of India Office in London, by John Sullivan, under the caption
 ‘The Kohi-Noor, to whom does it belong?

(Ed. Ganda Singh, The Punjab past and present, Vol IV, Part-I, Serial no. 7, April 1970,pp.109-55)

It reads , “By to-day’s” Times” I see that the great Diamond, the Koh-i-Noor, or Mountain of Light”, has been brought to this country, and that it is contemplation it to Her Majesty. It will be literally “the brightest Jewel” in her crown, and will aptly symbolize that great empire of which she is the head; but before you recommend Her Majesty to place it there, it may be prudent to ascertain whose property it is.”

The precious gem was the property of Duleep Singh, the young Rajah of Lahore, with whom, in March 1946, we concluded a treaty of “Perpetual peace and friendship,” but from whom on the 29th March 1849, we took his territory. Declaring it henceforth to be a portion “of the British Empire in India”. What then had the young Rajah done in this short interval to bring down such a heavy visitation upon him ?’

Further he writes, “ Though the state of Lahore had remained faithful to its engagements with the British Governments, the Government had violated its own engagements with the Lahore state.

I conclude this long story with an answer to the question on the title page, “ To whom does the Kohi-Noor belong ?”

“The Kohi-Noor,” therefore, in the opinion of the Governor-General did not form part of the property of the State. He might have made it such if he had pleased—but he failed to do so. He had no more right, therefore, I humbly venture to say, to compel his ward, the Maharaja of Lahore, to surrender the Kohi-Noor to the Queen of England, than Ranjit Singh had to extort it from Shah Shuja,” 

(Perhaps Mr. John Sullivan, then, did not have the correct account of Shah Shuja’s handing over of the Kohi-Noor to Ranjit Singh as a token of gratitude, for having him released from the custody of Atta Mohammad, Governor-General of Kashmir, which Wazir Fateh Khan of Kabul, an inveterate enemy of the Shah and his family, then residing under protection of Ranjit Singh at Lahore).
(Faqir Wahid-ud-Din, Real Ranjit Singh, New Delhi edition, pp. 87-90)

(I am thankful to Sardar Karnail Singh, for his splendid work in presenting the treasure on betrayl of British with his late friend after his death and confiscation of his property and personal valuables from the minor son of their friend, reveals the treachery and the jeopardize in faith, for which, History shall never excuse them).

The contents of this blog are taken from "ANGLO-SIKH WARS" written by Karnail Singh ji and published by SGPC, Sri Amritsar., to prove that Kohi-Noor belongs to Sikhs, though it adorns the crown of Queen of England.

Author :   Ajmer Singh Randhawa
 Source: http://kohinoorofsikhs.blogspot.in/


geocounter8

Sunday, 21 June 2015

SINGHS TEACH ARMED ROBBERS A LESSON IN UK SHOP

An armed robbery at the Bungalow shop in Heywood, UK was prevented after Singhs overpowered the robbers. The robbers came in through the front door with their faces covered and guns pointed at the Singhs.
The Singh at the cash register threw a hot cup of tea towards the robber giving the other Singh enough time to grab a hold of the man. The Singhs ended up overpowering one of the robbers and held him until police arrived on the scene.